
Plancher story has not ended
Sports columnist Pete Kerasotis
COCOA — Anything written right now about Ereck Plancher needs ellipses dots.
You know what I mean. Those three little dots . . . that indicate a sentence, or a story, is not complete.
This story is not complete. It might never be. The only thing we know for sure is that Ereck Plancher is dead.
Goodness, we don’t even have the autopsy report yet. How can you possibly put a period at the end of a sentence when we still don’t know why or how Ereck Plancher died?
What we do know is that the UCF football player collapsed March 18 during an offseason, on-campus workout, and was pronounced dead about an hour later at Florida Hospital East.
When he spoke to local boosters Thursday night, UCF head coach George O’Leary referred to it as “the incident.” It seemed odd, how O’Leary chose not to say Ereck Plancher’s name, but rather call the player’s death “the incident.”
…
What we do know, though, is that UCF changed its initial depiction of the workout, doubling its duration from the originally stated 10 minutes and 26 seconds, to 20 minutes.
There’s also criticism that in its internal investigation, UCF didn’t interview any of its players. I’ve been told from university spokespeople that this is protocol, and that they also wanted to honor the players’ grieving process.
But wouldn’t you want to be the ones interviewing your players about a teammate’s death, rather than the local newspaper?
Listen, it isn’t uncommon for authorities to tactfully interview grieving family and friends about a death that needs explanation. They do it all the time. UCF should’ve done that, too, and done it right away. They didn’t.
Now it is a month to the day later, and when I asked UCF spokesperson Grant Heston Thursday afternoon exactly how many players the university had interviewed to try to determine what happened, he said he thought there was one player.
One?
“I’ll get back with you on that,” he said.
Later, he sent me an e-mail telling me he was still trying to find that information. At 9:22 p.m., he sent another e-mail telling me he was still “looking into” my question.
I still don’t have an answer.
“I’m confident,” O’Leary said, “that in the long run things will come out that will prove what I said to be true.”
You know what that means?
To be continued . . .
Read the full story at FloridaToday.com