Player’s Death Leaves Unasked Questions
Friday, March 28th, 2008UCF Scandal editor’s note: Unlike other “scandal” sites, we are a very compassionate team here at UCF Scandal and share in the grief over the loss of Ereck Plancher. With respect, we’ll not editorialize on the school’s response, only publish the media’s findings.

How can UCF conduct an internal review into a player’s death without interviewing players?
Mike Bianchi
(NOTE TO READERS: I am updating my previous blog post with some clarification from UCF associate athletic director Joe Hornstein):
I have to tell you, I thought my eyes were playing tricks on me when I read our Kyle Hightower’s story in Wednesday’s Sentinel about UCF concluding its “catastrophic incident” internal review into the recent death of football player Ereck Plancher. In the story, it actually said that the review was completed without interviewing any of the football players.
Huh?
How do you conduct a internal catastrophic incident review without officially interviewing the people who were closest to Plancher that fateful day last week when he collapsed and died during an offseason workout? This would be like the police conducting an investigation into a vehicular death and not talking to the other passengers in the car.
Hopefully, there’s been some misunderstanding. Hopefully, somebody misspoke. Hopefully, UCF officials didn’t really conduct an official review without interviewing players, did they?
That’s why I contacted Hornstein Wednesday afternoon. His response: “On multiple occasions our players were strongly encouraged to speak to the coach and position coaches on anything dealing with the incident of March 18.”
Hornstein also sent me a statement in which it is pointed out that the catastrophic incident report “does not speak to or involve or provide a medical evaluation or conclusion of the incident,” but is intended to “establish protocol” when a catastrophic event happens.
That’s all well and good, but I’m still puzzled. It appears that this is as close to an official internal investigation as UCF is going to get. To complete it without any players being interviewed in an official capacity by some sort of school attorney or administrator seems almost unfathomable.
Seriously, how do you conduct an internal review into a player death without interviewing players?
As I wrote in a previous blog, UCF officials are obviously being very careful not to do anything or say anything that can be used against them should a lawsuit be filed. Let’s face it, in almost every case when a player dies during a team workout, somebody ends up getting sued. It happened at Florida State when Devaughn Darling died, it happened at Florida when Eraste Autin died and it happened at Northwestern when Rashidi Wheeler died. Meanwhile at the University of South Florida, the family of Keeley Dorsey, the South Florida player who died last January, has also retained a law firm to look into Dorsey’s death.
It’s understandable that school officials are worried about potential litigation, but the No. 1 concern here should be that Ereck Plancher is dead.
You would think a UCF investigator would officially interview anybody and everybody who was there that day — assistant coaches, equipment men, water boys, videographers and, yes, players — to find out if proper procedures were followed.
